Above Photo is of Judge Arlene Bluth.
April 2, 2024, New York, NY. Judge Arlene Bluth decided AGAINST “vaccine”-injured NYC firefighter, Obrian Pastrana. Pastrana sought ADR (Accidental Disability Retirement) as a result of suffering permanent disabilities after being injected with the so-called “vaccine”. The case is expected to be appealed.
The 4-page Decision is attached below. Please read for yourselves to evidence the Orwellian word salad that serves as this judge’s “decision” below.
Pastrana’s case will center on the legal meaning of the word “accident”. According to Black’s Law Dictionary (which is the go-to standard for law dictionaries), the definition of the word “accident” is: “an unintended and unforeseen injurious occurrence; something that does not occur in the usual course of events or that could not be reasonably anticipated; any unwanted or harmful event occurring suddenly…” 11th Edition.
In her decision, Bluth says that the adverse reactions Pastrana experienced were “incidental–not accidental”, and, since his disability was not “accidental” according to her, he wasn’t entitled to Accidental Disability Retirement. Her case law compares Pastrana’s “vaccine” injury to a case of DEHYDRATION, where dehydration was found to be a “foreseeable risk”.
Pastrana, of course, was NEVER told that the “vaccine” would result in permanent disability, or heart disease. He, like countless others, was never told there were any “foreseeable risks”. Also, like countless others, he got the “vaccine” to, as Bluth says in her decision, “comply with the vaccine mandate”, to keep his job.
What does this decision mean for medical freedom activists? This decision is tantamount to an admission that DISABILITY WAS A FORESEEABLE RISK INHERENT IN THE “VACCINE”. Bluth is essentially saying that the “vaccine” was UNsafe and risky, even though Pastrana was never informed of the risks. She is saying that the City INTENDED to cause Pastrana’s disability because an “accident” is UNINTENDED. She is saying that Pastrana’s disability “occurred in the usual course of events” of the so-called vaccine.
Pastrana was never informed of this “foreseeable risk”. He never made an informed, medical decision. This was an accident that happened to him, but was there a sinister pharmaceutical industry cabal knowingly harming people, intending to cause harm, foreseeing the risks? Of course there was, and Bluth’s decision, perhaps inadvertently, admits this.
And all this went on while the “vaccine” was endlessly promoted as “safe and effective”. Remember? Remember De Blasio bribing us with French Fries to get this “vaccine”? Did he ever mention “foreseeable risks”?
Of course he didn’t.
Read Bluth’s entire decision below:
